Mobile news

Moto g04 4G 2024 – If $179 is all you have, then go for it (smartphone review)

The Moto G04 4G 2024 is a $179 smartphone. As such, we need to examine what you get and what, if anything, is missing from this bargain handset.

Well, it has everything you need and the quality and performance you can expect at this price. It gets a definite buy recommendation because, frankly, you cannot expect or get more.

Purists may say:

  • The Unisoc T606 processor crawls – it does – but it is fit for purpose for typical use.
  • 4GB RAM is too small for Android 14. Well, you can boost this with virtual RAM up to 8GB (using storage as a swap space), and it’s not a bottleneck.
  • A single 16MP camera is inadequate. Well, yes but it is better than social media class and OK in reasonable light levels.
  • Mono sound sucks – well, most smartphone sound sucks, whether it’s mono or stereo. So use earphones for stereo and Dolby Atmos sound.
  • A 720p screen is so yesterday – and it is, but at the price, it is a damned good screen.
  • There are no OS upgrades and only two years (from launch) of quarterly security patches. This is more than you can expect at this price.

My point is that every one of the above comments has been made by professional reviewers who tend to think everything should be compared to an iPhone. CyberShack says it is an excellent $179n phone with no downsides for that price.

Its stablemate, the $229 Moto g24 (review coming), uses a different processor and camera but is essentially the same phone. Should you spend $50 more? Sure, if you have the cash to flash because, at $229, it represents good value.  It is the same repetitive argument – you buy the best phone in your price bracket – it is called bang for buck – and we are focused on that.

New review format

We are experimenting with our review format. Where we used to put all the raw data in tables at the end, we will now break them up and briefly comment on the various parts. Why? Readers who want to know more will paw over the tables. Readers who wish to see if it’s a good phone can just read the comments. Of course, we still have CyberShack’s’ View and rating explanation at the end – do make sure you read that.

We use Fail (below expectations), Pass (meets expectations) and Exceed (surpasses expectations or is the class leader) against many of the items below. We occasionally give a Pass(able) rating that is not as good as it should be and a Pass ‘+’ rating to show it is good but does not quite make it to Exceed. You can click on most images for an enlargement.

We are also tightening up on grading. From now on, Pass, for example, means meeting expectations for the price bracket. We consider a Pass mark to be 70+/100 with extra points added for class-leading and excellence.

Australian Review—Motorola G04 4G 2024, 4/64GB, dual SIM, dedicated microSD slot model XT2421-5

Note that there are two models: retail has a dual SIM, dedicated microSD slot, and a one-year warranty. Telco has a single SIM, dedicated microSD slot, and a two-year warranty.

Brand Motorola
Model Motorola g04 4G 2024
Model Number XT2421-5
RAM/Storage Base 4/64
   Price base $179
Warranty months 12 months retail
24-months Telco carrier
 Tier Entry-level
Website Product Page
From Motorola Online, Harvey Norman, JB Hi-FI, Bing Lee, Retravision, Australia Post, Big W, Officeworks
Telstra Satin Blue single sim $149 outright
Country of Origin China
Company It is owned by Lenovo (Est 1984) – a multinational technology company with its primary operational headquarters in Beijing and Morrisville, North Carolina. It is the world’s largest PC maker. It purchased Motorola Mobility from Google in 2014. Most of Lenovo’s smartphone business is now under the Motorola brand, with grand plans to become a ‘top five’ smartphone maker.
More CyberShack Motorola news and reviews
Cybershack smartphone news and reviews
Test date 1-7 May 2024
Ambient temp 15-18°
Release Feb 2024
Other models not for Australia (Don’t buy) Please read Don’t buy a grey market smartphone (updated guide)

First Impression – Pass

Motorola makes many phones covering the entire market, from entry-level to flagship flips. Its build quality never varies, and the g04’s build quality is as good as its top-line phones.

I particularly like the way the rear camera hump flows over the matte, fingerprint-resistant PMMA back.

Screen – Pass

It is a fit for purpose720p IPS LCD 20.1:9 screen with a 60 or 90Hz fixed or stepped refresh rate. It does not list screen protection, so you may want to invest in a screen protector.

Two hundred nits brightness cannot defeat direct sunlight, and its off-angle viewing shows colour shifts and loss of definition.

Size 6.6″
Flat, Curve, 2D, 3D Flat with centre o-hole
Resolution 1612 x 720
PPI 269
Ratio 20.1:9
Screen to Body % 84.9%
Colours bits 8-bit 16.7m colours
Refresh Hz, adaptive. Auto or select 60 or 90Hz
Response 120Hz N/A
Nits typical, test Test 220
Nits max, test Peak brightness not specified (Test 414)
Contrast Not specified (1200:1)
sRGB Test 94.5%
DCI-P3 Not tested.
Rec.2020 or other No
Delta E (<4 is excellent) N/A but above 4.
SDR Upscale No
Blue Light Control Yes
PWM if known No
Daylight readable No
Always on Display Peak display option
Edge display No
Accessibility Usual Android features
Gaming Not for gaming
Screen protection Unknown
Comment Blueish cast – best to use Natural setting. Fit for purpose

Processor – Passable

Every UNISOC phone I have tested has similar issues – lag under load. In typical use, it is fit for purpose. The virtual RAM feature adds slower storage RAM and does help a little. But with 64GB (39GB free), you may not want to hive off another 4GB for virtual RAM.

Brand, Model UNISOC T606
nm 12
Cores [email protected] + [email protected]
Modem 4G Cat 7
AI TOPS Estimate <4
Geekbench 6 Single-core 363
Geekbench 6 multi-core 1212
Like Used in Nokia G11/21/22/
Samsung Galaxy A03
Motorola e13/20/32
MT Helio G88, G85 and G80. Closest SD632 and 662.
GPU ARM Mali G57 1-core 650Mhz
GPU Test
Open CL 447
Like N/A
Vulcan 442 (way too low for games)
Storage, free, type 64GB UFS 2.2 (39GB free)
micro-SD Up to 1TB – dedicated slot
CPDT internal seq. Read MBps sustained 309
(Jazz maximum 566)
CPDT internal seq. write MBps sustained 244
(Jazz maximum 290)
CPDT microSD read, write MBps 78/42
CPDT external (mountable?) MBps 1TB test unit identified in My Files but not seen in CPDT – not mountable
Comment It is slow and laggy when under any load, often hanging for a second or more. However, it is the quintessential lowest-cost phone.
Throttle test
Max GIPS 133641
Average GIPS 131235
Minimum GIPS 118138
% Throttle Nil
CPU Temp 50
Comment Good thermal management

Comms – Passable

It has Wi-Fi 5 AC, which usually means 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. But no matter how we tried, it only connected to the 2.4GHz band. Its sibling, g24, connects to both. I am sure this is firmware-fixable, but it loses points. That means a maximum of 200Mbps connection speeds instead of 433Mbps, making it feel positively slow in downloading and streaming video.

Wi-Fi Type, model Wi-Fi 5 AC 2.4GHz – will only connect to 2.4Ghz 40MHz bandwidth
Test 2m -dBm, Rx/Tx Mbps -20/180/200
Test 5m -26/200/167
Test 10m -45/155/178
BT Type 5
GPS single, dual Single 6m accuracy
USB type USB-C 2.0 480Mbps
ALT DP, DeX, Ready For No
Requires fingerprint authorisation and third-party mobile app (Google Pay)
Ultra-wideband No
   Accelerometer Yes -combo with Gyro is very sensitive
   Gyro Yes
   Ambient light Yes
   Hall sensor
   Proximity Yes
   Other No
Comment Wi-Fi AC speeds are lower than expected—they should have been 433Mbps if it could connect at 5Ghz. Again, this is typical of the UNISOC.

It only connected at 2.4GHz and the speeds are quite variable. see the wide variations in Rx, Tx, and Ping.

LTE and 5G – Pass

It gains points for dedicated dual SIMM and microSD slots and if it is fit for purpose for all Australian 4G bands (not an international use phone).

The UNISOC modem finds only one tower and connects at excellent signal strength. As it does not find the adjacent four towers, it is suitable for city and suburban use only.

SIM Dual sim and dedicated microSD
   Active Only one active at a time
Ring tone single, dual Dual
VoLTE Carrier dependent
Wi-Fi calling Carrier dependent
4G Bands 1/3/5/7/8/28/40/41
Comment All Australian 4G bands
5G sub-6Ghz N/A
Comment N/A
mmWave N/A
Test Boost Mobile, Telstra
  DL/UL, ms 14.7/7.1/27ms – below average
   Tower 1 -dBm, fW or pW -78 to -84/4-16pW – good single tower
   Tower 2 No
   Tower 3 No
   Tower 4 No
Comment It appears typical of the Unisoc modem. This is a city/suburbs phone only if you have good tower coverage.

Battery – Passable

There is nothing wrong with the battery life—it loses points for not being supplied with a charger or cable. The good news is that it only uses 5V/2A/10W, so any older charger and USB-C cable will work. It will recharge from a PC USB port as well—it may take longer. The video loop was over 14 hours, the charge time was around two hours, and you should get two days of physical use between charges.

mAh 5000
Charger, type, supplied Not supplied – 5V/3A/15W capable
Out tests did not see this above 5V/2A/10W.
 PD, QC level No PD, but you can use PD chargers.
Qi, wattage N/A
Reverse Qi or cable. N/A
Test (60Hz or adaptive screen) Adaptive
   Charge % 30mins 6 hours
   Charge 0-100% 2 hours 10 minutes
   Charge Qi, W
Using Belkin Boost Charge 15W fast wireless charge
   Charge 5V, 2A Over 7 hours
   Video loop 50%, aeroplane 14 hours 15 minutes
   PC Mark 3 battery 15 hours 37 minutes
   GFX Bench Manhattan battery
   GFX Bench T-Rex 685.4 minutes (11.42 hours) 1863 frames
   Drain 100-0% full load screen on 5 hours 37 minutes
   mA full load 1150-1250
   mA Watt idle Screen on 300-350
   Estimate loss at max refresh N/A
   Estimate typical use Given it is a low-powered processor, a typical user should get two days.
Comment Reasonable battery life, slowish charge times and no charger.

Sound – Passable

It is a mono speaker focusing on clear voice. It can decode Dolby Atmos and output via Bluetooth to earphones. Hands-free was a little soft, and it had no background noise cancelling.

Speakers Mono earpiece in phone mode and mono bottom speaker in hands-free or music.
Tuning No
AMP Unisoc
Dolby Atmos decode Yes, for 2.0 earphones.
Hi-Res No
3.5mm Yes
BT Codecs SBC, AAC, free aptX and aptX HD and LDAC 16-bit/44100/48000
Multipoint Unknown – likely not
Dolby Atmos (DA) Smart, Music, Film, Game, Podcast, and Custom EQ
Mics Single bottom mic
Test dB – all on EQ flat DA off
   Volume max 80
   Media (music) 75
   Ring 78
   Alarm 80
   Notifications 73
   Earpiece 65
   Hands-free Slightly low volume, no noise-cancelling, so keep it close to your face.
   BT headphones Average volume and channel separation

How does it sound? – Pass

As a mono speaker, we don’t usually test the native frequency response, but we did anyway. It has no bass, almost no low-and-mid-mid, decent high-mid and low-mid treble for clear voice and limited high treble.

As long as you use earphones for music, this is fine.

Deep Bass 20-40Hz Nil
Middle Bass 40-100Hz Nil
High Bass 100-200Hz Starts at 100Hz and slowly builds to 1kHz
Low Mid 200-400Hz Slowly building
Mid 400-1000Hz Slowly building
High Mid-1-2kHz Flat
Low Treble 2-4kHz Flat
Mid Treble 4-6kHz Flat
High Treble 6-10kHz Decline to 8kHz to avoid harshness and then climbs to 9kHz.
Dog Whistle 10-20kHz Flat to 14kHz, then off a cliff
Sound Signature type Mid for clear voice. The music quality is poor, with no bass, no treble, and lacking vitality.
   Soundstage Mono – none
Comment It is suitable for voice but not for music.
Similar to the Moto g24

Build – Pass+

It is well-built and should last a few years. We call out the lack of a charger and cable but compensate with a silicon bumper cover.

Size (H X W x D) 163.49 x 74.53 x 7.99 mm
Weight grams 178.8g
Front glass Not specified
Rear material PMMA
Frame PMMA
IP rating IP52 Water-repellent coating
Colours Concord black
Satin Blue
Sunrise Orange
Pen, Stylus support No
In the box
   Charger No
   USB cable No
   Buds No
   Bumper cover Yes
Comment Loses points due to no included charger

OS – Pass

Previous models at this price used 32-bit Android Go and a limited set of Go apps. This is a full-fat 64-bit Android.

It has no OS upgrade but a reasonable two years of security patches from the launch date. Moto adds some excellent usability features, and its UI is a light touch over Android, so it is easy to use.

Android Android 14
Security patch date 1 March 2024
UI Display: Ambient display
Gestures: Fast torch, Three-finger screenshot, Sidebar, Double press power button, Press and hold power button
OS upgrade policy No
Security patch policy Two years of security patches
Bloatware, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok
Other Moto apps – some duplicate Google apps.
Comment There is a lot of added functionality in MY UX, which leaves the underlying Android alone.
Fingerprint sensor location, type On power button – 8/10 test
Face ID Yes

Moto g04 4G 2024 rear camera – Passable

A single 16MP sensor with a high crop ratio means that it tries to use electronic image stabilisation to reduce shakes and keep the horizon level. The result is a cropped image that can be smaller than the preview. It has very limited AI post-processing capabilities.

It is acceptable for day and office light. It struggles in low light and video.

Rear Primary Wide
  MP 16MP with 7.4X crop
   Sensor Hynix HI1634
   Focus PDAF
   f-stop 2.2
   um 1
  FOV° (stated, actual) 68.5 (H) x 80.9 (D)
   Stabilisation No
   Zoom 4X digital
   Video max 1080p@30fps
   Flash Yes
   Auto-HDR Yes, but not really effective
Shooting modes:
Night Vision

Artificial intelligence:
Google Lens™ integration
Other features:
Assistive Grid

   QR code reader Yes
   Night mode Not enough AI to do this

Moto g04 4G 2024 front camera – Passable

A 5MP fixed-focus selfie with a relatively tight field of view means it is for single selfies only.

  MP 5MP
   Sensor Hynix HI556 or Galaxy Core GC05
   Focus FF
   f-stop 2.2
   um 1.12
  FOV (stated, actual) 65.9 (H) x 78 (D)
   Stabilisation No
   Flash Screen fill
   Zoom No
   Video max 1080p@30fps
    Features Shooting modes:
Artificial intelligence:
Face Retouch

Shooting modes:
Other features:
Snap-in Video Recording

Comment Reasonable skin tone. Poor low-light images and video.

CyberShack’s view – The Moto g04 4G 2024 is as good as it gets for the price

I said most of what needed to be said in the preamble. If you have $176, then there are no downsides. I can see this being a great kid’s first phone; give it to Granny, or it is excellent for those who can’t afford more.

Rush to Telstra and get the single sim carrier version for $149 outright purchase with a 2-year warranty.


We remind readers that 70 is the new pass mark – you should only be concerned if a review is below that.

Ratings New for 2024 – 70 is a pass mark
Features 70
It has basic features commensurate with the price. Loses points due to no charger inbox
Value 75
It has the bare necessities at a reasonable price.
Performance 70
It is an entry-level value SoC, and you get fit-for-purpose laggy performance. It is not for gamers.
Ease of Use 70
My UX adds some value to stock Android. Two years of security patches is all you can expect.
Design 70
All PMMA plastic is fine – it looks like a more expensive smartphone.
Rating out of 10 70
Final comment This entry-level device replaces the e13, which uses the same SoC, screen, camera and more. It has enough power to be usable, runs 64-bit Android 14 (no OS updates) and has NFC.
1 My UX is a light touch over Android. Good security policy
2 As low as you can go and still get a decent smartphone
3 Reasonable battery life (but no charger)
4 An adequate point-and-shoot camera, but the video is for daylight only.
1 Mono speaker (all we expect)
2 Processor crawls
3 No charger inbox
4 Capital city/suburbs phone use only
5 Dull, inaccurate colour, poor viewing angle display

Motorola Privacy and Terms and Conditions – Pass

We remind you that these are in addition to Google Android policies – read Can you trust Google? Yes, but it depends on your definition. If you are privacy conscious, we advise using Google Apps where possible and avoiding Motorola sign-on and experiences.

You can still use the phone without signing up to Motorola and adjust privacy settings, so we will classify the privacy policy and terms and conditions as benign.

But know that its Privacy Policy (9474 words) and Terms and Conditions (2236 words) allow it to collect every possible piece of information that the phone can provide. Motorola states that it does not sell personal information but does provide it to business partners. It does not state where its cloud data is stored but states that it complies with the laws of the countries it sells in.

Moto g04 4G 2024

$179 retail and $149 for Telco version


  • My UX is a light touch over Android. Good security policy
  • As low as you can go and still get a decent smartphone
  • Reasonable battery life (but no charger)
  • An adequate point-and-shoot camera, but the video is for daylight only.


  • Mono speaker (all we expect)
  • Processor crawls
  • No charger inbox
  • Capital city/suburbs phone use only
  • Dull, inaccurate colour, poor viewing angle display


This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.