Meta to fight criminal charges brought by Andrew ‘Twiggy’ Forrest over alleged cryptocurrency ad scam | Andrew Forrest

Facebook’s parent company Meta will fight criminal charges brought by philanthropist billionaire Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest over an alleged cryptocurrency clickbait advertising scam.

Lawyers for the tech giant formally pleaded not guilty on Wednesday in Armadale magistrates court to three counts of recklessly dealing with proceeds of crime to the value of $1,000 or more.

The matter was committed to the West Australian district court, where the commonwealth is expected to take over the prosecution because a private citizen cannot prosecute charges on indictment.

The mining magnate has accused Meta of being criminally reckless in allowing bogus advertisements for a cryptocurrency investment scheme using his image to appear on its site.

Meta lawyers pleaded not guilty to three counts of recklessly dealing with proceeds of crime.

When Forrest launched the case last year it was the first time Meta had been prosecuted with criminal charges in connection with the running of its social media platform.

It is alleged the company failed to take sufficient steps to take down the scam advertisements, which feature Forrest and other prominent Australians.

Forrest was also ordered to hand over hundreds of sensitive documents he had been fighting to keep private.

Meta previously issued a summons for 20 categories of documents after accusing the mining magnate’s lawyers of failing to hand over papers relevant to the legal battle.

These included personal emails and communication about overseas litigation funding for the case he has launched against the platform in the United States.

Meta also demanded a copy of a privileged draft letter sent by Forrest’s lawyers to the commonwealth attorney general after it accused them of failing to hand over papers relevant to the legal battle.

Multiple emails were also among the documents sought, including communication between Forrest’s lawyers, emails to expert witnesses and reports about the use of third-party advertisements featuring his name.

Magistrate Melita Medcalf’s ruling ends 18 months of bickering between the parties over the documents.

Meta did not have it all its way, however, with Medcalf denying the company access to certain privileged documents it had sought.

She also refused its application to use the documents in other similar cases, including its battle against the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

Forrest has previously said he made repeated requests to Facebook to take down the advertisements, which he alleges appeared in 2019.

He also launched civil proceedings against Facebook in California in September 2021.

The WA matter will return to the district court on 9 February.


This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.