The FBI plans to use Amazon’s controversial Rekognition cloud service “to extract information and insights from lawfully acquired images and videos,” according to US Justice Department documents.
In its Agency Inventory of AI Use Cases, the DOJ lists the project, code-named Tyr, as being in the “initiation” phase for the FBI, which intends to customize and use the technology “to review and identify items containing nudity, weapons, explosives, and other identifying information.”
The DOJ document doesn’t mention a start date, and simply says the Feds will be using a Rekognition-based commercial off-the-shelf system purchased pre-built from a third party. The FBI declined to comment, and though Amazon promised The Register a statement in response to our inquiries, that has yet to arrive.
In addition to providing facial recognition and analysis services, Amazon says Rekognition can also search for objects in image and video libraries and detect “inappropriate, unwanted, or offensive content,” among other capabilities.
Amazon previously pledged to indefinitely ban police from using Rekognition — but with some loopholes. It didn’t pause selling the service to government agencies, however, or to third-parties that may then provide the technology to cop shops.
So, to be fair, Project Tyr doesn’t break any earlier promise by the cloud giant. It does, however, come at a time when concerns about warrantless surveillance seems to be growing, especially when the FBI is doing the snooping.
Earlier this week, Amazon said it would kill the easy button that allowed law enforcement to request Ring video footage without a warrant. Specifically, Amazon sunsetted the Request for Assistance feature in its Neighbors app, which allowed the plod to slurp Ring customers’ video recordings. Now officers have to ask first.
The move was applauded by data privacy and civil liberties advocates.
“The ability for law enforcement to use the Neighbors app to mass-request footage from camera owners was always dangerous, and had a documented effect of exacerbating racial profiling,” Fight for the Future Director Evan Greer told The Register in an earlier interview.
On the other hand, the news about the FBI using Rekognition promoted a very different response.
NSA buys up Americans’ browser records
“I think it’s important to look both at FBI and Amazon practices in this space,” said Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology’s (CDT) Security and Surveillance Project.
“The FBI permits broad use of facial recognition in investigations (people don’t even need to be designated suspects to be scanned), programs its systems to always return matches even if those matches are unreliable, and hides use of facial recognition from defendants,” Laperruque told The Register.
“With all those factors in mind, it would be deeply disturbing if Amazon had gone back on its pledge not to sell facial recognition to law enforcement,” he added. “There are no federal laws limiting how the FBI and other agencies use this invasive technology, and their own policies are far too lax. So long as it’s a wild west in terms of use, there’s no excuse for backsliding.” ®
