Business

U.S. judge dismisses aluminum antitrust claims By Reuters


3/3

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo commodities trader Glencore is pictured in Baar

2/3

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Wednesday narrowed a long-running antitrust case where aluminum purchasers accused Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:) and the mining company Glencore (LON:) of conspiring to drive up the metal’s price by reducing supply.

U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer said many purchasers lacked standing to sue because they had bought aluminum primarily from smelters such as Alcoa (NYSE:) and Rio Tinto (LON:) Alcan rather than directly from the defendants, and thus did not qualify as “efficient enforcers” of antitrust laws.

In a 66-page decision, the Manhattan judge also said pricing decisions by the smelters appeared to be a big factor in the prices ultimately charged, and that those prices were “not the inevitable result of defendants’ alleged conspiracy.”

The purchasers had accused banks and commodity trading, mining and metals warehousing companies of conspiring to hoard aluminum when prices were low roughly a decade ago.

They said this resulted in delays in processing orders and higher storage costs, raising the cost of making cabinets, flashlights, soda cans and other goods containing aluminum.

Engelmayer dismissed all claims by several individual purchasers including Eastman Kodak and Fujifilm, as well as claims by some “first level” purchasers whose motion for class certification he had denied last July.

The judge said Reynolds Consumer Products and two other plaintiffs that transacted directly with the defendants could still pursue their cases.

Lawyers for the various plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Goldman spokeswoman Maeve DuVally, JPMorgan spokesman Brian Marchiony and Glencore spokesman Charles Watenphul declined to comment.

READ  Loans scheme must work faster, government admits

The litigation began in 2013. Another judge had dismissed various antitrust claims in 2016, but was overturned by the federal appeals court in Manhattan in 2019.

The main case is In re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern (NYSE:) District of New York, No. 13-md-02481.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.